Home

By Luc Loranhe (2006)

I am totally against violent crime. I believe that both First World and Third World societies are too lenient with organized gangs who abduct women, sell them into prostitution, or keep them locked up and force them to serve clients... Not clients they would have freely chosen themselves, but their slavers' clients.

Yes, I am in favor of strict punishment for violent crime. This obviously includes rape and abduction.

But I would like it make it clear that violent crime, per definition, is a form of crime that includes a certain degree of violence. I do want to point this out because it is the trend in many countries to define certain acts as statutory violent crime.

In many countries, if a 19-year-old or a 30-year-old man (no age discrimination!) has a genuine love affair with a 17-year-old girl, and this is brought to the attention of the police or the courts, than he is prosecuted for statutory rape, even if the two didn't even have penetrative sex.

This is rape only by name (thus statutory), but not in essence. The invention of statutory sexual crime more often than not is the work of Western feminazis, and regularly has the features of anti-male revenge.

Some men just hate women. And some women just hate men.

Men who hate women will have a hard time to find a modern forum or organization where they can translate their hate into activism.

Women don't have that kind of a problem. There are numerous organizations on every level of (Western) society, all openly dedicated to fight men.

***

If you read Wikipedia on the term “feminazi”, you will come across this sentence: “James Joyner noted upon Andrea Dworkin's death that she seemed to typify what critics were calling a feminazi."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminazi

Indeed, hatred towards men per se seems to speak out of much of her writing. It’s not just that some men a physically violent against women (which is covered as a crime in the statutes of every country); rather, in Dworkin’s opinion, the violence of men towards women is inherent, so it appears, in heterosexuality and in the mere fact of penetrative intercourse. It’s the ideological basis on which even non-violent sexual practices are defined as statutory violence.

The Andrea Dworkin biography on Wikipedia quotes the following passage from her book “heartbreak: The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant”:

“Sitting with Ricki, talking with Ricki, I made a vow to her: that I would use everything I knew, including from prostitution, to make the women's movement stronger and better; that I'd give my life to the movement and for the movement. I promised to be honor-bound to the well-being of women, to do anything necessary for that well-being. I promised to live and to die if need be for women. I made that vow some thirty years ago, and I have not betrayed it yet.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin

I don’t know whether she made the vow in this exact wording. As she has died, she cannot be asked anymore. But I do know that in emotional situations, humans emphasize what they hate, rather than constructive ideas. Therefore, a much more common vow is:

“I hate men. Until the end of my days, I will just hate men. From now on, I will do everything I can to fight men, even if it takes my life.”

Emphasizing hatred rather than constructiveness also is much better suited to account for her aggressiveness and militancy.