Their model is that young people live with their families and concentrate on their education until they are at least 18, and that after achieving a good education, they enter a responsible life-long intimate relationship with a person they have known as a non-sexual friend for many months.
They will typically have a car, a dog, and two children, and pay a mortgage for about 15 years. They then expect their children to live roughly the same life, but with better digital equipment.
What a bore! What a waste of one's life. Their sexual relationship will typically be totally exhausted after a few years, but they are expected not to have other sexual partners until they die. To have other sexual partners would be regarded as dishonest, would be considered cheating, and it would be seen as negating their love relationship from the beginning.
If I imagine myself in such a life, I develop fear of dying... I develop fear of dying because I would die without having had much of a life.
Now for my model: We all have many, or at least several genuine love relationships in our lives. This is an exciting perspective, as we do not know who will be with us in a love relationship next month, next year, or in five years.
However, we can be pretty sure that we will be in a new love relationship, because in my model, all people have genuine new love relationships quite often (apart from sexual adventures). And in my model, one certainly stays good friends with a person with whom one had a previous love relationship.
In my model, people will have sexual relationships earlier in life than in their model. Sex is healthy, provided there are no problems with hygiene and infections. Sex is healthy for the mind. People who have satisfying sex are much less likely to follow crazy ideas. Sex helps people to develop a balanced self. Young people with a satisfying sex life, and a constant interest in more sex (in this life), are much less likely to become fanatics than those who follow the sexual restrictions prescribed by various religions.
Of course, in their model, early sex is excluded. They have to exclude it so that young people are receptive for the religious nonsense they propagate.
In my model, we do not change our lifestyle as we grow older. Basically, we live the same way, whether we are 16 or 60. Whether we are young or old, there are three aspects in our daily lives: love, work, and learning.
In my model, people spend much less time earning money and pursuing careers. Excessive wealth is not supportive of happiness. It is much better to have only what is needed, and apart from that, to have time for each other (and for learning).
Learning ought to be a life-long endeavor. In my model, people don't just obtain an education during their youth, and then work in a related field throughout their lives.
I think that everybody should start working early in life (at an age of about 14), as this provides financial independence and makes young people full adults. Young people earn their own money, and learn adult responsibilities.
In my model, work should be part-time for all people, and all people should be encouraged to continue their education throughout their lives. Most universities would be open universities where everybody can enroll, without having passed the courses of lower educational institutions.
I think it is odd that some people do nothing but study until they are about 30, and that they live of support that long, and that after graduation, they all of a sudden become well-paid professionals.
In my model, education would be much more gradual, and obtaining education would always be accompanied by part-time work. Self-employed work should be encouraged from an early age.
My model applies equally to women and men, and I do want to emphasize that I am a true feminist. I definitely am a better feminist than those women who concentrate on technical issues such as equal pay for equal work, and I am a much better feminist than those feminazis who erroneously believe that feminism is about fighting males, or male character expressions.
I am a better feminist than they are because, unlike theirs, my feminism is based on a sound philosophical foundation: that optimal orgasms and a gentle death is the most appropriate path for anybody's life, and this applies equally to women and men.
Genuine feminism, and genuine female emancipation, is not about equal pay for equal work, and other minor matters. It is also not about opposing men. Genuine feminism, most of all, is about female sexual liberation. It is about females not being restricted from pursuing sexual satisfaction, without being brainwashed into believing that they will have to pursue love in a traditional marriage setting (and that it's the man's fault if it doesn't work out).
In their model, the ages of sexual partners are always closely matched. The female partner in a sexual relationship typically is two or three years younger. Such an order is highly discriminative towards people who are getting older, and disadvantageous to those who are still young.
But not only is such an order discriminative and disadvantageous. It is also sexually unnatural. My observation throughout many years clearly shows that actually, younger people are often sexual attracted to older partners, and older people to younger partners, and this is the same for both sexes.
When I was a teenager, I and my friends were convinced that an older woman was much to be preferred as a sexual partner. A woman in her 30s, 40s, 50s, or even 60s, if she cared about her physical appearance. Men below the age of 20 have such great sexual potency that they can be sexually excited by a woman of any age. And to be seduced by older women has greatly enriched my life as a teenager during the 1960s (the years when Western societies were sexually most liberated).
Yes, I believe that older women who actively seek much younger male partners make a major contribution to feminism... a more important contribution than housewives who dedicate their spare time to issues such as male sexual abuse.
That, on the other hand, older men often are sexually attracted by younger women is so obvious that no further examples are needed to support this observation.
And when girls and young women are not brainwashed into believing that a sexual relationship with a much older man is inappropriate, girls and young women indeed can psychologically benefit much more from a sexual relationship with a mature man than a boy of equal age.
And again, those girls and young women who have sexual relationships with older men contribute more to feminism than mothers who teach their daughters that they have a right to reject all sexual advances by men (brainwashing under the pretext of being protective).
In my model, there is little birth control. I believe that it is natural that in human societies, most people are young. I am not concerned with overpopulation. Nature will always regulate the human population. This needs no interference by men. Yes, maybe sometimes more people will die than are newly born. So what?
There is no such thing as eternal life. The one thing that is certain is, that we all will die. Mathematically, all our lives are infinitesimally short. Life in itself is not a value. But it is important that we concern ourselves with questions of how we die. Death should be gentle, and it should not be preceded by suffering.
In my model, women don't have to worry so much about preserving their youthful appearance, and they don't have to worry much about the effects that giving birth will have on their physique. Anyway, women, as they grow older, will aim for younger sexual partners, and the younger the males they seek, the less they will consider signs of maturity a hindrance. As teenagers, I and my friends were proud to have sexual relationships with women who already had children. It gave us an aura of being mature ourselves, and young people definitely conceive this as highly positive.
No amount of cosmetic creams and plastic surgery will allow aging women to keep pace with their aging male partner's growing preference for ever younger females. This is why in my model, such sexual unions better are dissolved, and both the male and the female partner enter subsequent sexual relationships with younger people.
There is, furthermore, nothing wrong with the older partner, whether male or female, providing material support to the younger partner. This doesn't have to mean that the younger partner enters the sexual relationship primarily for material benefits.
Their model, all their models, are wicked. Any way you turn them, their models don't work. In my model, everything falls into place, because it is based on both, nature and reason.
